🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar debates in other member states